Here is a figure laying out a more nuanced way that I propose for understanding the believing/belonging/behaving paradigm:
Here is some speculation on examples from each location:
- High Belief/Low Belonging/Low Behaving
- e.g. Cultural Christians
- Low Belief/High Belonging/Low Behaving
- e.g. Mainline Protestants
- Low Belief/Low Belonging/High Behaving
- e.g. Reform Christians
- High Belief/High Belonging/Low Behaving
- e.g. nondemoninational Christains
- High Belief/Low Belonging/High Behaving
- e.g. Buddhists
- Low Belief/High Belonging/High Behaving
- e.g. Conservative Jews
- High Belief/High Belonging/High Behaving
- Evangelical Protestants
- Low Belief/Low Belonging/Low Behaving
- e.g. seculars
--
Steensland et al. 2000. "The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art." Social Forces 79(1):291-318.
Smidt, Corwin E., Lyman A. Kellstedt, and James L. Guth. 2009. "The Role of Religion in American Politics: Explanatory Theories and Associated Analytical and Measurement Issues." Pp. 3-42 in The Oxford Handbook of Religion and American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press. Ed
No comments:
Post a Comment